The post Unlock Big Tax Deductions for Cannabis Under 280E appeared first on Green Team CFO.
]]>IRS Code 280E prohibits businesses classified as “trafficking” in controlled substances from deducting most ordinary expenses. This restriction affects cannabis companies because cannabis remains federally illegal. Unlike typical businesses, cannabis companies cannot deduct rent, utilities, or wages outside production costs—expenses that other businesses commonly use to lower their tax burdens.
The key exception here is cost of goods sold (COGS). While 280E limits most deductions, cannabis businesses can still deduct COGS, as it directly impacts gross income. By focusing on COGS, companies can effectively reduce their taxable income. Below, we cover the deductions that cannabis businesses can leverage through COGS and other careful accounting strategies.
Understanding and maximizing COGS deductions is vital for cannabis businesses to comply with 280E and minimize taxes. COGS represents the direct costs of producing goods, including:
Documenting these costs accurately is essential for maximizing deductions. By properly categorizing expenses, cannabis businesses can ensure they deduct every eligible cost under COGS.
A practical way to increase deductions under 280E is by separating production activities from general business functions within the facility. This process, known as “facility segmentation,” divides a location into spaces dedicated solely to production versus general administration. By allocating more space to production, businesses can apply a larger share of facility costs—such as rent and utilities—to COGS.
For example, if 70% of a facility is reserved for production, 70% of rent and utility expenses can go toward COGS. This approach helps companies maximize deductions and save on taxes.
Inventory capitalization involves adding certain indirect costs to the value of inventory, which are then deducted through COGS when the inventory sells. Cannabis companies can capitalize expenses such as:
Partnering with a tax advisor experienced in cannabis finance can help ensure that these expenses are capitalized correctly, boosting deductions without risking compliance issues.
For cannabis businesses, choosing between cash and accrual accounting can impact tax outcomes. Generally, companies with inventory are required to use accrual accounting, which deducts COGS as it’s incurred rather than when it’s paid. This approach benefits cannabis companies by aligning deductions with actual sales and inventory costs.
By using accrual accounting, cannabis businesses may manage the timing of deductions better and smooth out taxable income. Consult a tax professional before making this choice, as the decision should align with both compliance and financial goals.
Section 471 of the tax code allows businesses that manufacture products to include a wider range of indirect costs in COGS. For cannabis businesses, this means potentially capturing additional deductions by allocating expenses such as:
Section 471 gives cannabis companies some flexibility in applying indirect costs to COGS, which can increase allowable deductions. A knowledgeable accountant can assist in applying this code effectively and within legal boundaries.
If a cannabis business has borrowed funds for building or improving production facilities, some of these interest expenses may be deductible as part of COGS. This could include interest from loans used to purchase cultivation equipment or upgrade production spaces.
Allocating interest to COGS allows companies to gradually offset costs over time. This strategy is particularly useful for businesses that invest heavily in expanding production capacity.
While general depreciation is not deductible for cannabis businesses, depreciation of assets used exclusively in production may qualify under COGS. If a company invests in cultivation equipment, processing machinery, or other production-specific assets, these costs can be depreciated over time as COGS deductions.
This approach both reduces taxable income and supports long-term growth, as tax savings can be reinvested in expanding production capabilities.
Navigating IRS Code 280E requires detailed planning and precise record-keeping. The following expert tips can help cannabis businesses stay compliant while maximizing deductions:
IRS Code 280E poses unique tax challenges for cannabis business owners, limiting deductions that are typically available to other companies. Yet, by understanding and maximizing deductions under COGS, cannabis businesses can improve profitability even within these limitations. Techniques such as facility segmentation, inventory capitalization, and the strategic allocation of interest and depreciation expenses all offer ways to reduce tax burdens. Working with a knowledgeable cannabis tax professional can help you make the most of these options, ensuring that your tax strategy remains compliant and effective.
Implementing these strategies allows cannabis companies to grow their business, manage cash flow better, and reduce the tax impact of 280E, leading to a more financially sustainable future.
The post Unlock Big Tax Deductions for Cannabis Under 280E appeared first on Green Team CFO.
]]>The post Top Tax Deductions and Strategies for Cannabis Businesses Under 280E appeared first on Green Team CFO.
]]>Passed in 1982, IRS Code 280E prohibits companies trafficking in Schedule I or II controlled substances from deducting typical business expenses on their federal tax returns. Since cannabis remains classified as a Schedule I substance federally, cannabis businesses—including dispensaries, growers, and processors—cannot deduct ordinary and necessary expenses like rent, utilities, and marketing. The impact? Many cannabis operators face effective tax rates significantly higher than those of other industries.
However, there’s a silver lining. IRS Code 280E does not apply to the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), which allows businesses to deduct certain expenses related directly to product production. By strategically focusing on COGS deductions and implementing efficient tax planning, cannabis businesses can mitigate some of the financial strain imposed by 280E.
While IRS Code 280E limits deductions for cannabis businesses, certain costs can still qualify for deduction. Let’s dive into the primary areas where cannabis businesses can legally reduce taxable income.
COGS deductions are critical for cannabis businesses operating under 280E. These deductions include the direct costs involved in producing and acquiring the goods that will be sold. Here are common COGS deductions cannabis businesses may claim:
It’s important to maintain accurate, detailed records of COGS-related expenses to substantiate these deductions and avoid potential audits.
The IRS permits cannabis businesses to leverage Section 471 for inventory accounting, which allows certain indirect costs to be allocated to inventory—and subsequently deducted as part of COGS. These indirect costs might include:
Section 471 requires businesses to follow specific inventory accounting methods, making it essential for cannabis operators to consult a CPA experienced in cannabis tax law to ensure compliance and maximize deductions.
Section 263A, or the Uniform Capitalization Rules, allows businesses to capitalize both direct and indirect costs associated with inventory. While Section 263A was initially designed for large manufacturers, many cannabis businesses can benefit from this provision, which provides greater flexibility in capitalizing indirect expenses. Under Section 263A, cannabis businesses can capitalize:
It’s worth noting that adopting Section 263A can be complex, requiring consistent application and thorough documentation. A tax professional familiar with cannabis regulations can help implement this strategy effectively.
Capital improvements to buildings and facilities used in cannabis production can sometimes be capitalized and depreciated over time. Facility improvements that are directly related to production, such as upgrades to HVAC systems, lighting for grow rooms, or enhanced security systems for inventory storage, may qualify for deduction as capital expenses. However, improvements in retail or general office areas may not be eligible.
Navigating 280E requires precision and strategy. Here are some actionable tips for maximizing allowable deductions without falling afoul of the law.
By clearly delineating production areas from retail and administrative spaces, cannabis businesses can increase the costs that qualify for COGS deductions. For example, reserving specific areas exclusively for growing, processing, and packaging cannabis products can allow for more direct and indirect costs to be allocated under COGS.
Proper bookkeeping is essential in the cannabis industry, especially given the IRS’s close scrutiny of 280E-affected businesses. Keeping detailed records of each expense, including invoices, payroll records, and receipts, is critical to substantiating deductions. Organized record-keeping not only simplifies the tax filing process but also strengthens your position in the event of an audit.
IRS Code 280E is complex, and few CPAs specialize in cannabis tax law. Working with a CPA who understands the cannabis industry ensures your business can take full advantage of allowable deductions while staying compliant with IRS regulations. These professionals can help develop a tax strategy that leverages every available deduction and mitigates the impact of 280E.
Tax regulations for cannabis are continually evolving, especially as states expand legalization and federal policies shift. Staying informed of the latest regulatory changes—and adjusting tax strategies accordingly—can provide significant financial advantages. Additionally, it’s wise to revisit your business’s tax strategy each year to ensure it reflects current operations and compliance practices.
Consider a cannabis cultivator who operates both a grow facility and a retail dispensary. The cultivator assigns specific portions of rent, utilities, and labor costs directly associated with growing to COGS. By tracking these production-related expenses separately from retail expenses, the cultivator is able to deduct more costs from taxable income. Although retail expenses like point-of-sale systems, marketing, and customer service wages cannot be deducted, the strategic allocation of production costs allows the business to legally reduce its taxable income under 280E.
To further reduce tax risk under 280E, cannabis businesses should adopt the following expert practices:
Despite the restrictions of IRS Code 280E, cannabis businesses can still find ways to reduce their taxable income through careful COGS deductions, inventory accounting strategies, and precise record-keeping. Given the high stakes of non-compliance, partnering with a cannabis-savvy CPA or financial advisor is one of the best investments a cannabis business can make. By implementing these tax strategies, cannabis businesses can better manage their tax liabilities and position themselves for long-term financial growth.
The post Top Tax Deductions and Strategies for Cannabis Businesses Under 280E appeared first on Green Team CFO.
]]>